The Vestal Virgins: A Symbol of Rome

tumblr_mdegizZu2G1qbfhrao6_500

What do we know about the Vestal Virgins? We know from the potentially biased primary and secondary sources of Cicero, Plutarch, Varro, and Cassius Dio that the Vestals were priestesses of the goddess of the hearth, Vesta. The priestesses were chosen from the ages of six to ten to participate in an almost life long religious commitment. Six virgins from ‘complete’, aristocratic families (displaying no deformities) were taken by the Pontifex Maximus to serve the goddess Vesta for thirty years; after which time they were allowed to live as they so choose. Most, understandably, remained in the cult. Women’s Life in Greece and Rome stipulates that upon removal from their families, the Virgins have “the right to make a will during their father’s lifetime and to conduct their business affairs without a guardian” (Lefowitz & Fant 2005). The Vestal Virgins were charged with protecting the sacred fire of the city, which was never allowed to go out. During the Vestalia, the Virgins would sweep out the ashes of the fire and use water to purify the temple. They were the only people to participate in the creation of the mola salsa – the ground meal sprinkled over sacrifices. The rights the Virgins gained upon indoctrination into the cult, including the only instance of female possession of lictors, was equally as unique as the severe consequences faced for their religious impiety. If a Virgin allowed the fire to go out, they would be whipped. If a Virgin was found to be unchaste, they were subject to a ritual of live internment. Ariadne Staples writes in her The Uses of Virginity: The Vestals and Rome, “In no other instance that we know of was the transgression of a ritual injunction ever punishable by death” (132). If a Virgin was unchaste she was ritually buried alive publicly in the city of Rome.

There were many anomalies surrounding the existence of the Vestal Virgins. First was the fact that they were (arguably) the only women to wield power in the city of Rome. In effect, they were the symbolic center of Rome. They were tasked with keeping the fire ‘alive’ – the life of Rome. As Staples writes, “a single lapse by a single priestess threatened the very existence of the state” (135). Why choose a woman and not a man to symbolically represent Rome? It’s quite possible that the position was not ideal for men. An aristocratic man taking on the responsibilities of a Vestal Virgin would be a downgrade from his position of power. It’s also likely that women were considered inherently more pure then men and therefore more of a ‘blank slate’. Women, without the guardianship of a man, did not enjoy a consequential status. When you project meaning onto something, it must not already have meaning. The Vestals were pure and unattached vessels. The Romans were able to imbue them with the symbolism of the state as a whole. The fact that they were the only people allowed to live in the Forum is a testament to their connection with the city. In addition, they were the only people buried inside the city. Their virginity was intertwined with their symbolic connection with Rome. Staples writes, “A Vestal’s virginity represented life, death, stability, and chaos for the Roman state” (135). In a sense, the Vestals retained an ambiguity outside the realm of Roman citizens. They became vessels onto which the ideals of Rome were placed. Their ambiguous nature allowed them to better represent the collective as a whole. A Vestal’s ideological virginity de-sexualized her.

I am skeptical of the circumstances surrounding the supposed internments of the Virgins. According to Staples, there are “only two recorded instances of Vestals being punished for unchastity during the period between the first Punic war and the end of the Republic” (134). Both of these noted burials took place during times of emotional upheaval and were subsequent reactions to the news of great losses to the Roman legions. Staples posits that “The religious measures taken to quell the panic were not merely extensive, they were extreme, even to the point of human sacrifice” (136). It is quite possible that the burials were a form of political propaganda. The city was in a state of unrest and the Virgins became a safeguard upon which to place the blame. Their ritualistic deaths could have placated the public and quite possibly had no real conjunction to the Vestals’ chastity. In addition, according to archaeological finds, we have no evidence of bodies being buried within the city. It’s also possible that the burials were purely symbolic and that none of the Virgins were interned.

Could the Vestals’ privileges be a product of their status outside the system in the same way that female festivals were marginalized in Roman society? It’s interesting to see that in both contexts, these events are exceptions to the rule only because of their marginalization.

I am also curious to see if there is a real connection between the Vestal Virgins and Zoroastrians. Zoroastrianism is an ancient religion centered on the worship of fire and the god Ahura Mazda. Zoroastrians believed that water and fire were the agents of ritual purity. Once it was properly consecrated, a temple fire was never allowed to go out. The Avesta is a collection of the sacred texts of Zoroastrianism. There is an additional etymological similarity between Vesta and Avesta that is incredibly interesting.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Vestal Virgins: A Symbol of Rome

  1. ryank825 says:

    Dear Olivia,
    I am intrigued by your connection of the Vestal Virgins being connected to another religious ritual done by the Zoroastrians. I do not know anything about this culture and I am curious to see if you are going to further your investigation into the connection between the two cultures. I was also wondering if you knew if there was a link to other elemental rituals in these cultures as this could further support your evidence of a connection.
    If you recall in class we talked about how the taking on of Christianity kept the idea of female virginity in high regard. In Christianity the most important miracle that occurred was the immaculate conception. Mary, Jesus’ Mother, was a virgin and was impregnated by God who then gave birth to Jesus. The question I ask is why was it so important to make Mary a virgin.? Did it have anything to do with the importance of the Vestal Virgins, in Rome, prior to Christianity chosen as the region of the Empire? I am not sure if these questions will be discussed in class or if not hopefully a fellow student will investigate this question for their research project.
    From,
    Ryan

  2. mpelter says:

    Dear Olivia,

    I really enjoyed your blog this week. I agree that there are a lot of anomalies regarding their status and function. I do agree that they might have been given the position because they were more pure, and more of a “blank slate” than men. However, I also think that the nature of the position (being the priestess to the goddess of the hearth) may have also played a role into why women were the priestess of Vesta. Vesta represented the hearth, which for me reperesented the home in the ancient Roman society. Women were associated with the home in ancient Rome as well. Who better to protect the sacred hearth than a woman? However, I also feel that the Vestal Virigns probably cannot be categorized into one category, so perhaps both of our interpretations are correct.
    I too am skeptical about the supposed interment of the Vestals. Without any actual physical evidence, I feel that it is possible that it was either political propaganda (as you have said), or a fabricated story told to illustrate a point about the Vestals. I also agree that the “interment” of the Vestals may have been symbolic as well. However, until we find actual evidence either for the interment of the Vestals, I too remain skeptical of the event occurring.
    I too am curious to see if there is a connection to Zoroastrianism. It would be very interesting, especially in context of what the Romans thought of the Persian religion. Did they see the similarities between there Vestals and the Persians as well? Also, it is interesting in the contrast between the two. Vesta was a female goddess with female priestess. Ahura Mazda was a male god with male priests. Do they represent the same diety, passed down to both cultures through a common ancestor? Its very interesting to see the gender contrast along those lines as well.
    Overall, great blog.
    Megan

  3. Pingback: Ancient Rome’s Obesession with Purity: The Vestal Virgins – Women in Antiquity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s